WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday tried to sow the seeds of mystery in its second review of a long-standing Georgia-Florida dispute over flowing water in suburban Atlanta towards the Gulf of Mexico

Citing Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle, the judges are perplexed by Florida’s claims that the blame for decimating the state’s oyster industry lies with Georgian farmers who use too much water from the river Flint

By the time the Flint joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River at the Florida border, too little remains for Florida’s once-lucrative oyster fishery

Georgia says fault lies in overfishing of oysters, historic droughts and mismanagement, among other reasons

Chief Justice John Roberts said many factors could have played a role, comparing the situation to the murder of Christie on the Orient Express “

“A lot of things have attacked the fisheryBut you can’t say that any of these things are responsible for the death of the fishery,” said Roberts

Justice Clarence Thomas has given the dispute between the two states, and their differing claims about the very amount of water involved, a title in the style of Doyle’s tales of Holmes, “The Case of the Disappearance of the ‘water “

Florida seeks court order requiring Georgia to limit its use of Flint’s water When judges first heard the dispute three years ago, Florida also claimed that the water consumption from the Atlanta area of ​​the Chattahoochee River had also played a significant role in reducing flows in Florida, but that claim fell out of the case, Gregory Garre, Florida attorney said in arguments on Monday. by phone due to the coronavirus pandemic

“I guess I would say in closing that it’s hard to imagine New England without lobsters or, say, the Chesapeake without crabs, but, in fact, it’s a future that Apalachicola now faces in regarding its oysters and other species, “Said Garre

Last year, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission voted unanimously to stop oyster harvesting in Apalachicola Bay until the end of 2025 due to declining oyster population

Craig Primis, representing Georgia, urged judges to end the case in his state’s favor because Florida failed to conclusively prove its northern neighbor was responsible for the Apalachicola problems

Florida’s lawsuit against Georgia was filed directly with the Supreme Court, which is primarily an appeals court but hears interstate disputes.The court has appointed a special master to assess the case, and it initially recommended that Georgia win

But three years ago, judges voted 5-4 to give Florida another chance to prove their case

The court appointed a new special master, who also recommended the court side with Georgia Florida’s objections to this recommendation are in the Supreme Court

The result could be the opinion of the two new judges, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, who were not yet on the court when the dispute is heard in 2018

The judges they replaced, Anthony Kennedy and the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both voted with Florida

Kavanaugh asked similar questions from both sides, which made it difficult to assess how he might vote

Barrett wondered if Georgia could take action without spending too much to help revive Apalachicola oysters. “How do you put a price on an environmental benefit like this?” she asked


World News – FI – Second High Court Hearing in Florida-Georgia Water War

Source: https://www.startribune.com/second-high-court-hearing-for-florida-georgia-water-war/600026098/